Surrogacy is Morally Wrong Essay -- Surrogacy Is Immoral

In this paper, I argue that if the debate about the morality of surrogacy is couched in terms of regard due to other human beings and the paramount importance of their intimate relationships with champion another, then it may be shown that most ordinary instances of surrogacy are chastely handle. Human flourishing cannot be separated from ones relationships with others and some(prenominal) circumstance which is destructive of such relationships must be considered immoral. The surrogate, unless she is treated as an object or merely as a means to an end, is almost involved in the relationships between the child and its putative parents and important relationships blend in ambiguous and so violateed. Furthermore, if this view if rejected, then the feminist argument that surrogacy ceaselessly involves the exploitation of the surrogate renders it immoral. The debate about surrogacy revolves around the following issues (a) whether it is in the interests of the child involved or in the interests of society or (b) whether it is consumptive of the birth mother or in the interests of women, as a whole. In considering the issues under (a) it is often argued that children are at risk of harm from having socially constructed family relationships rather than natural ones. Many commentators have likened the experience of children and birth mothers in surrogacy arrangements to children and relinquishing mothers in adoption, and point to the potential psychological and social harm that may result. (1) One argument against surrogacy therefore revolves around the relationships which are involved. Although scold of interests seems to couch the debate in utilitarian terms (2) it is not the solely dash in which the arguments about surrogacy may be seen. Another way of seei... ...s the potential for depersonalisation strong, quoting the case of a woman who said of her infant (in an a case of altruistic surrogacy), We are just using Jacki as a suitcase really, an incubat or to carry it. At the end of the sidereal day its our child. Rowland, R. Op. Cit., 164(17) Ibid., 164-166(18) Szikla, C. Surrogacy, Why Women Lose,http//www.readings.com.au8080/wise/RT2.htm, 3-6(19) Another etymon is to say that this dichotomy does not hold and that there is nothing wrong with a mnage trois (or quatre, if both sperm and ovum are donated). This solution, however, changes our conceptions of labor union and radically alters the context in which the problem is being discussed in this paper.(20) charm Mitchell, J.D. In Vitro fertilisation The Major Issues - A Comment, Journal of medical checkup Ethics, Vol. 9, 1983, 196-199, who makes a similar point.