Response to the three students with no more than 80 words with at Coursework

Response to the 3 students with no more than 80 words with at least 2 references for each response - Coursework instanceWorse of all, there was no reference list and a couple of grammatical mistakes.It is said that in the comparison of leaders to show growth of leadership, fallouts done in the comparison of the leadership attributes exhibited by the conglomerate leaders hinders the success of the whole comparison (Herman, 2000). This is because there ought to be comparison so that the real moments of ontogeny can be identified but this was lacking in the students presentation. Even more, the student presented his dates in a descending order alternatively of ascending order to give a open(a) link between the leaders. Clearly, dates do not flow in descending orders (Almah, 2008).The writer did a striking job by linking the personal attributes and natures of the leaders to their leadership reign and this brought out a great esthesis of the leadership styles practiced by the lea ders. This has always remained an important practice in the comparison of leaders for evolution of leadership (Amahe, 2011). The writer could however have widened his search of leadership database to include leaders from different backgrounds instead of two leaders from United States presidential background. Once this is done, the comparison lacks dynamism (Grey,