Cyclic Nature Of Language English Language Essay

Cyclic Nature Of lyric poem English linguistic communication EssayThis line comes under the prescribed Part 1 phrase and Cultural context. The topic I cede chosen is Cyclic nature of actors line. This topic is related to the Part 1 of English as it deals with convert of the English Language which influences all the cultures throughout the world since the beginning of time. Language in itself has been evolving over the centuries. I have gone about this line of work in such a modal value that it shows the difference in the way of communication (through expression) since the beginning of time to the dustup that has come to be in the redeem day. It shows the evolution of communication from gestures to emergence of diction to change in language itself and so back to gestures and visual representations. This change is shown through examples akin (change in bound of asking someone to keep quiet) shhh hist could you please go forward silent? Keep quiet shut up shhh -X.The aim of this task is to bring out the possibility of the claim that language is cyclic in nature. This is also a individualal opinion hence I have chosen a blog fake to express myself freely piece using an informal approach. Also this enables me to put crosswise my opinion among a varied range of audience who great power be able to irritate this when in the form of blog. The blog helps my text to be conveyed in a generic form and audience as intended.Language came into existence in order for humans to communicate. This can be said for any form of language. It began from grunts, sign language and gestures in the 6000BC and evolved into the defined universal form of language which we speak in the present day. We fluent speak in gestures, only along with language too. After all actions speak louder than terminology. When angry we however wave our hands about or run offensive gestures, when adroit a smile is intact on our face, when we feel compassionate we hug, fondle or embrace, when despising someone we either glare or make a face.1To communicate or send a message across we usually end up gesturing rather than only white plague words. gibe to me gestures are a way better pixilateds of expression or communication than words of a language as it is more universal, intrinsic and natural. Not all gestures have evolved over the years like language has. Some gestures come naturally to everyone. If worried or deep in thought one involuntarily frowns.However lately it is seen language is deteriorating instead in the lit date of referencel sense. Here is an example to show the deterioration of language over the past few centuries-Dost thou feel melancholic? (18th century)Is it mournful that you feel? (19th century) ar you unhappy? (20th century)R u? (21st century)Above is a simple example of how the language has evolved over the past centuries with the concocting still intact. Yes, a chap from the 19th century go out only be able to guess at the most, what the emoticon conveys. If anything, he will be strike at the lack of words utilise when enquiring after someones well being. Whereas, a 21st century dude will only ever use words like thou and melancholic as a joke. It is cast of evident how inappropriate using either kind of language in either century would be. Linguists and literature lovers cringe over the language used today. Authors from the earlier centuries might roll in their graves at the modernistic meanings of same words used earlier. However evolution of language is needful and necessary too. Whether for the good or the bad, it differs from someone to person depending on their perception. On one hand a literature lover might enrapture in the fancy and articulate language used earlier and despise the brief and hasty way the language has sour into in the present day. On the a nonher(prenominal) hand, a 21st century, text savvy teenager might appreciate the usage of language in the earlier centuries and go out it a part of the lush history of literature but will be more comfortable using the abbreviated form of language these days.Also it is very important to note that the changes noted in the form of communication are in the form of letters in the remote days and texts now a days. Earlier, communication was slow and less frequent. nevertheless it was important and more efficient for the letters to be long and communicatory. Whereas in the present day not only communication is extremely brisk and efficient, meeting someone is also very easy. Hence in the era where texting and video calling is possible and it is almost like communicating with the person face to face, one doesnt feel the need to be overly expressive and long. Being brief does the task. Earlier it might be considered rude to be curt and all of a sudden but now being long in your sentences in informal communication (where being short is perfectly fine) might make you look like a literary snob. In a way it is quite efficient as, even though the sentences are short it gets the point through.Either way it is seen how sentences have become shorter, words abbreviated, legitimate words for emotions all together turned into emoticons, gestures conveyed through words turned into visual gestures, tone conveyed by exclamations. Example Thou you u dingy I love you I UWhat? ?It is obvious from the above to the uttermost to which language is literally deteriorating. One could claim how language is cyclic in nature. It started from grunts and gestures and went through the phase of development of language to emergence of different languages and then evolution of words in language to abbreviation to conversion of words into visual gestures altogether. Are we going back in time? Are we becoming barbaric and unrefined? Does it matter?Does it matter that the English language is deteriorating? Because is not the primal use of a language to communicate? If the other person understands what you are try ing to say to the same extent that you mean it, then does it actually matter how language changes? Moreover, I think when you alter it, it defines you more, gives what you are saying more meaning if anything.My opinion is my own and it is not my intention to offend anybody whose opinion differs from mine. Yes I still acknowledge the event that it is important to speak right if not, change of language would not mean evolution but just mere slothfulness and ignorance of one to shoot a language properly. If that were to be entertained, not a single person would understand another without a manual on their own kind of language. Yet an efficient and meaningful change should not be laid-off simply but acknowledged and embraced as the time changes too.