Capturing the Friedmans Essay -- Film Movies

Capturing the FriedmansIn 2003, Andrew Jarecki released his documentary Capturing the Friedmans, which explores a seemingly principle middle-class families struggle when the father and male child are charged with familiar abuse and molestation in 1987. The Friedmans from the outside seem desire a healthy family, abiding in a fairly exclusive great Neck, Long Island community the father Arnold is a Columbia Graduate and a school teacher, while the mother Elaine, a housewife. They have three sons David, Seth, and Jessie whom count to be a happy, intelligent, and good-humored group of brothers. The power and prestige of this scoot comes not from its controversial and serious subject matter, unless from the unbiased flair in which the story is presented. Jarecki gives the audience an equal amount of facts that could be utilise to argue both sides of the equation, which leaves one realizing that perhaps what really transpired isnt the point hes aiming for in this film. The audi ence is left not knowing whether or not Arnold and his son Jesse committed the crimes, but instead they are left realizing truth is irrelevant, because we pull up stakes n ever so really know exact details, just the disintegration and sad destruction of the Friedman Family. Regardless of the validity of the claims, there definitely seems to have been something foreign and tragic about the collapsing Friendman Family. The patriarchal/ matriarchal relationship was broken, Arnold and Elaine didnt seem genuinely much in love anymore, and the boundaries between the parents and the children became less pyramid like and more horizont... ...at because of the size of the children there would have been physical symptoms, no attested evidence of this sort was presented during the case. Out of 100 students no physical symptoms were ever recorded, and not one student said anything about abuse until cardinal years later when the investigator was pursued (Silvergate, 2004) No parents ever filed complaints earlier to police investigation. Because memories are malleable and children are even more defenseless to authority, it is very probable that some children just complied to the leading questions due to fear, but is it possible that they all could? The influence of the investigators parallels to the influence of therapists in cases of sexually maltreated childrens recovered memories.Works Cited1)Silverglate, Harvey A Takei, CarlMistrial- The Capturing The Friedmans DVD sheds new light on the case. Newsday