Reading Analysis Of Two Essays

Douglas Rushkuff in his article Why we listen to what they say colloquy about how the media coerce young adults and the youth to lie to themselves with penetrative , confusing , non-conformist and irrational campaign ads . The purpose of the agent was to apologise to the reader just how the media manipulates its audience into buying something that they site with and how the extension X has responded to their manipulations . While Misia Landau in her report on How media military unit touches children attempt to convince the reader that media force as support by scientific research are injurious to children . Rushkuff s (2000 ) origination of his ideas followed a cause-and-effect format wherein he first hash outed the reasons why media consultants and grease names changed the story of their ads and the message it sen ds , then goes on to discuss and give evidence of just how this changes coerced the viewing popular to trace with the brand . On the early(a) hand , Landau (2001 ) utilise an effect-oriented format wherein she tried to give examples of the effect that media violence arrive at on children s health . For both articles , one has to read it throughout in to understand what each is trying to say , stave , Landau had a better way of presenting the effects based on research conducted by a reputable organization , magical charm Rushkuff s interchange seem to be much of a conceptualisation than evidenced by hard facts . Landau was probably trying to flesh parents in her report and she made a good casing in it by giving examples specifically those involving children , patch Ruskuff by chance commanded to reach young adults or the youth economize his style was to a greater extent inclined to readers with an academic orientation .

His intelligence where somewhat rhetorical and difficult to follow given that he tend to jump from one idea to the next , part Landau was simply reporting to her audience how media violence affects children , there s no difficulty with that . The two essays are similar in the magician that they present the negative side of media , one violence the early(a) is product marketing , they were also at the same scent that media is a powerful tool that can be used and manipulated by other people to the detriment of children and a soulfulness s sense of self . They were different though in their approaches , Landau was more of an easy reading her evidences supported her arguments while Rushkuff s article was diffuclt to plump for in one reading . Thus , Landau is more sound in getting her point across her readersReferencesLandau . M (2001 . How media violence touches children . FOCUSRushkuff , D (2000 . Coercion : Why we listen to what they say . FRONTLINE...If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper